Malaysia vs Uruguay: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before
Malaysia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uruguay
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before over time
- Malaysia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control before, Malaysia or Uruguay?
- Malaysia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control before between Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control before?
- Malaysia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control before construction index (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control before construction index evaluates quality control in the review of the building plans. The index measures whether by law, a licensed architect or engineer is part of the committee or team that reviews and approves building permit applications and whether that person has the authority to refuse an application if the plans are not in conformity with regulations. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.