Australia vs Hong Kong: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during
Australia
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
1st
Hong Kong rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during over time
- Australia
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Australia currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during, Australia or Hong Kong?
- Australia, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during between Australia and Hong Kong?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Hong Kong rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- Australia ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.