Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during
Chile
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
20th
Papua New Guinea rank
20th
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during over time
- Chile
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 20th and Papua New Guinea ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during, Chile or Papua New Guinea?
- Chile, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during between Chile and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- Chile ranks 20th and Papua New Guinea ranks 20th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.