Papua New Guinea vs San Marino: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during
Papua New Guinea
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
20th
San Marino rank
20th
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during over time
- Papua New Guinea
- San Marino
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and San Marino ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during, Papua New Guinea or San Marino?
- Papua New Guinea, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during between Papua New Guinea and San Marino?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and San Marino?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and San Marino rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and San Marino ranks 20th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.