San Marino vs South Africa: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during
San Marino
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino rank
20th
South Africa rank
20th
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during over time
- San Marino
- South Africa
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during, San Marino or South Africa?
- San Marino, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during between San Marino and South Africa?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and South Africa rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- San Marino ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 20th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.