Australia vs Uganda: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Australia
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uganda
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
1st
Uganda rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Australia
- Uganda
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Australia or Uganda?
- Australia, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Australia and Uganda?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Uganda rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Australia ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.