Eswatini vs South Africa: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Eswatini
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Eswatini rank
1st
South Africa rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Eswatini
- South Africa
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 186 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Eswatini or South Africa?
- Eswatini, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Eswatini and South Africa?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and South Africa rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Eswatini ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.