Guinea vs Japan: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Guinea
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Guinea rank
1st
Japan rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Guinea
- Japan
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Guinea or Japan?
- Guinea, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Guinea and Japan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Japan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Guinea ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.