Hong Kong, China vs Mauritius: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Hong Kong, China
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mauritius
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Mauritius, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Hong Kong, China or Mauritius?
- Hong Kong, China, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mauritius rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.