Hong Kong vs Tanzania: Dealing with construction: Quality of building … regulations
Hong Kong
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Tanzania
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
Dealing with construction: Quality of building … regulations over time
- Hong Kong
- Tanzania
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Tanzania, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Hong Kong or Tanzania?
- Hong Kong, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Tanzania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Hong Kong and Tanzania?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Tanzania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Tanzania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.