Jordan vs Viet Nam: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Jordan
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Viet Nam
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Jordan rank
1st
Viet Nam rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Jordan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Jordan or Viet Nam?
- Jordan, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Jordan and Viet Nam?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Viet Nam?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Viet Nam rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Jordan ranks 1st and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.