Republic of Korea vs Thailand: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Republic of Korea
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
1st
Thailand rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Republic of Korea
- Thailand
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Republic of Korea or Thailand?
- Republic of Korea, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Republic of Korea and Thailand?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Thailand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Thailand rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.