Mongolia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Mongolia
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mongolia rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Mongolia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Mongolia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Mongolia, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.