Russian Federation vs Tajikistan: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Russian Federation
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Tajikistan
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Russian Federation
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Russian Federation or Tajikistan?
- Russian Federation, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Russian Federation and Tajikistan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tajikistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Tajikistan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Russian Federation ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.