San Marino vs Sudan: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
San Marino
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sudan
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino rank
1st
Sudan rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- San Marino
- Sudan
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, San Marino or Sudan?
- San Marino, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between San Marino and Sudan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- San Marino ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.