Sweden vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations
Sweden
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Tunisia
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden rank
1st
Tunisia rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations over time
- Sweden
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Tunisia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations, Sweden or Tunisia?
- Sweden, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations between Sweden and Tunisia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Sweden and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Sweden ranks 1st and Tunisia ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.