Albania vs Argentina: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Albania
14.12
in 2019
Argentina
15.85
in 2019
Albania rank
178th
Argentina rank
177th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Albania
  • Argentina
05101520200520122019

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 15.85 against 14.12 in Albania, a difference of 1.73.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Argentina ahead.

Albania ranks 178th and Argentina ranks 177th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Argentina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Argentina Difference Ahead
2000s 0 2.31 2.31 Argentina
2010s 7.84 3.59 4.25 Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Albania or Argentina?
Argentina, at 15.85 against 14.12 in Albania as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Albania and Argentina?
1.73, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Argentina?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Albania and Argentina rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Albania ranks 178th and Argentina ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.