Antigua and Barbuda vs Fiji: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
65.99
in 2019
Fiji
66.86
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
99th
Fiji rank
96th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Fiji
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 66.86 against 65.99 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.87.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 99th and Fiji ranks 96th of 188 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Fiji Difference Ahead
2000s 67.03 67.9 0.8646 Fiji
2010s 66.51 66.86 0.3459 Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Fiji?
Fiji, at 66.86 against 65.99 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Fiji?
0.87, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Fiji?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Fiji rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 99th and Fiji ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.