Antigua and Barbuda vs Grenada: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
65.99
in 2019
Grenada
65.42
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
99th
Grenada rank
102nd

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Grenada
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 65.99 against 65.42 in Grenada, a difference of 0.57.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 99th and Grenada ranks 102nd of 188 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 67.03 65.42 1.61 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 66.51 65.42 1.1 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Grenada?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 65.99 against 65.42 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Grenada?
0.57, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Grenada?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Grenada rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 99th and Grenada ranks 102nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.