Austria vs Central African Republic: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score (Time days)
Austria
43.52
in 2019
Central African Republic
44.38
in 2019
Austria rank
158th
Central African Republic rank
157th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score (Time days) over time
- Austria
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 44.38 against 43.52 in Austria, a difference of 0.86.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 158th and Central African Republic ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.52 | 44.38 | 0.8645 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 43.52 | 44.38 | 0.8645 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Austria or Central African Republic?
- Central African Republic, at 44.38 against 43.52 in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Austria and Central African Republic?
- 0.86, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Central African Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Central African Republic rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Austria ranks 158th and Central African Republic ranks 157th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.