Austria vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Austria
43.52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
44.96
in 2019
Austria rank
157th
Papua New Guinea rank
155th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Austria
  • Papua New Guinea
010203040200520122019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 44.96 against 43.52 in Austria, a difference of 1.44.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 155th of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 43.52 44.96 1.44 Papua New Guinea
2010s 43.52 44.96 1.44 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Austria or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 44.96 against 43.52 in Austria as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Austria and Papua New Guinea?
1.44, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Papua New Guinea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Austria and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Austria ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.