Azerbaijan vs Saint Lucia: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Azerbaijan
74.06
in 2019
Saint Lucia
74.06
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
65th
Saint Lucia rank
65th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Saint Lucia
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 74.06 against 74.06 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 65th and Saint Lucia ranks 65th of 188 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 48.7 68.36 19.65 Saint Lucia
2010s 54.99 74.06 19.08 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Azerbaijan or Saint Lucia?
Azerbaijan, at 74.06 against 74.06 in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Azerbaijan and Saint Lucia?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Saint Lucia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Saint Lucia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 65th and Saint Lucia ranks 65th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.