Bahrain vs Lithuania: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Bahrain
87.03
in 2019
Lithuania
86.17
in 2019
Bahrain rank
15th
Lithuania rank
17th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • Lithuania
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 87.03 against 86.17 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.86.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Lithuania ahead.

Bahrain ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 17th of 188 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 59.08 61.14 2.07 Lithuania
2010s 60.32 76.31 15.99 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Bahrain or Lithuania?
Bahrain, at 87.03 against 86.17 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Bahrain and Lithuania?
0.86, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Lithuania?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Bahrain and Lithuania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Bahrain ranks 15th and Lithuania ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.