Belgium vs Dominican Republic: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Belgium
46.4
in 2019
Dominican Republic
48.13
in 2019
Belgium rank
153rd
Dominican Republic rank
150th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Dominican Republic
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 48.13 against 46.4 in Belgium, a difference of 1.73.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 153rd and Dominican Republic ranks 150th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 46.4 43.23 3.17 Belgium
2010s 46.4 48.85 2.45 Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Belgium or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 48.13 against 46.4 in Belgium as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Belgium and Dominican Republic?
1.73, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Dominican Republic?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Belgium and Dominican Republic rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Belgium ranks 153rd and Dominican Republic ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.