Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Belize
66.57
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
65.99
in 2019
Belize rank
97th
Equatorial Guinea rank
99th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Belize
  • Equatorial Guinea
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Belize currently reports 66.57 against 65.99 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.58.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 97th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 99th of 188 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 66.57 65.99 0.5764 Belize
2010s 66.57 65.99 0.5764 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
Belize, at 66.57 against 65.99 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
0.58, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Belize ranks 97th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 99th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.