Bolivia vs Guatemala: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Bolivia
39.77
in 2019
Guatemala
42.36
in 2019
Bolivia rank
162nd
Guatemala rank
160th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Bolivia
  • Guatemala
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 42.36 against 39.77 in Bolivia, a difference of 2.59.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 162nd and Guatemala ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 46.74 30.66 16.08 Bolivia
2010s 40.03 54.78 14.76 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Bolivia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 42.36 against 39.77 in Bolivia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Bolivia and Guatemala?
2.59, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Guatemala?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bolivia and Guatemala rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Bolivia ranks 162nd and Guatemala ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.