Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
55.62
in 2019
Zimbabwe
56.2
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
131st
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 56.2 against 55.62 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.58.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.47 | 12.33 | 3.86 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 51.76 | 18.16 | 33.6 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 56.2 against 55.62 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
- 0.58, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.