Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
44.38
in 2019
Nicaragua
42.65
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
157th
Nicaragua rank
160th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 44.38 against 42.65 in Nicaragua, a difference of 1.73.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 157th and Nicaragua ranks 160th of 190 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.38 | 41.5 | 2.88 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 44.38 | 42.65 | 1.73 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Nicaragua?
- Central African Republic, at 44.38 against 42.65 in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
- 1.73, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Nicaragua rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 157th and Nicaragua ranks 160th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.