Central African Republic vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Central African Republic
44.38
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
44.96
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
157th
Papua New Guinea rank
156th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 44.96 against 44.38 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.58.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.38 | 44.96 | 0.5764 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 44.38 | 44.96 | 0.5764 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Central African Republic or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 44.96 against 44.38 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.58, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 157th and Papua New Guinea ranks 156th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.