Democratic Republic of Congo vs Mali: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score (Time days)
Democratic Republic of Congo
72.33
in 2019
Mali
71.76
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
75th
Mali rank
77th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score (Time days) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Mali
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 72.33 against 71.76 in Mali, a difference of 0.57.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 75th and Mali ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.62 | 44.03 | 5.42 | Mali |
| 2010s | 71.07 | 67.15 | 3.92 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Mali?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 72.33 against 71.76 in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Mali?
- 0.57, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Mali?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Mali rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 75th and Mali ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.