Congo, Rep. vs Russian Federation: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Congo, Rep.
60.23
in 2019
Russian Federation
60.09
in 2019
Congo, Rep. rank
118th
Russian Federation rank
120th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Russian Federation
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Congo, Rep. currently reports 60.23 against 60.09 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.14.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Congo, Rep. has been ahead every year.

Congo, Rep. ranks 118th and Russian Federation ranks 120th of 188 countries.

Congo, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Rep. Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 55.91 0 55.91 Congo, Rep.
2010s 58.93 35.79 23.14 Congo, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Congo, Rep. or Russian Federation?
Congo, Rep., at 60.23 against 60.09 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Congo, Rep. and Russian Federation?
0.14, with Congo, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Russian Federation?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Congo, Rep. and Russian Federation rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Congo, Rep. ranks 118th and Russian Federation ranks 120th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.