Costa Rica vs Poland: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Costa Rica
67.72
in 2019
Poland
68.01
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
93rd
Poland rank
90th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Poland
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 68.01 against 67.72 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.29.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 93rd and Poland ranks 90th of 188 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 50.14 28.65 21.5 Costa Rica
2010s 63.63 63.6 0.0288 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Costa Rica or Poland?
Poland, at 68.01 against 67.72 in Costa Rica as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Costa Rica and Poland?
0.29, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Poland?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Costa Rica and Poland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Costa Rica ranks 93rd and Poland ranks 90th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.