Côte d'Ivoire vs Russian Federation: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Côte d'Ivoire
60.52
in 2019
Russian Federation
60.09
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
118th
Russian Federation rank
121st
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 60.52 against 60.09 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 118th and Russian Federation ranks 121st of 190 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 18.16 | 35.79 | 17.63 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Russian Federation?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 60.52 against 60.09 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation?
- 0.43, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 118th and Russian Federation ranks 121st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.