Czechia vs Guatemala: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Czechia
36.6
in 2019
Guatemala
42.36
in 2019
Czechia rank
163rd
Guatemala rank
160th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Czechia
  • Guatemala
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 42.36 against 36.6 in Czechia, a difference of 5.76.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 163rd and Guatemala ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 29.68 30.66 0.9798 Guatemala
2010s 36.6 54.78 18.18 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Czechia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 42.36 against 36.6 in Czechia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Czechia and Guatemala?
5.76, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Guatemala?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Czechia and Guatemala rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Czechia ranks 163rd and Guatemala ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.