Czechia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score (Time days)
Czechia
36.6
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
39.19
in 2019
Czechia rank
166th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
164th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score (Time days) over time
- Czechia
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 39.19 against 36.6 in Czechia, a difference of 2.59.
That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 166th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 164th of 191 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.6 | 0 | 36.6 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 36.6 | 30.61 | 5.99 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Czechia or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 39.19 against 36.6 in Czechia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Czechia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 2.59, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Czechia ranks 166th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 164th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.