Dominican Republic vs Guyana: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Dominican Republic
48.13
in 2019
Guyana
47.55
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
150th
Guyana rank
152nd

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Guyana
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 48.13 against 47.55 in Guyana, a difference of 0.58.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guyana ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 150th and Guyana ranks 152nd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Guyana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Guyana Difference Ahead
2000s 43.23 48.82 5.59 Guyana
2010s 48.85 47.55 1.3 Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Dominican Republic or Guyana?
Dominican Republic, at 48.13 against 47.55 in Guyana as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Dominican Republic and Guyana?
0.58, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Guyana?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Guyana rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 150th and Guyana ranks 152nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.