Dominican Republic vs Indonesia: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Dominican Republic
48.13
in 2019
Indonesia
49.82
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
150th
Indonesia rank
149th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Indonesia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 49.82 against 48.13 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.69.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Indonesia ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 150th and Indonesia ranks 149th of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 43.23 52.45 9.22 Indonesia
2010s 48.85 50.59 1.74 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Dominican Republic or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 49.82 against 48.13 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Dominican Republic and Indonesia?
1.69, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Indonesia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Indonesia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 150th and Indonesia ranks 149th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.