Dominican Republic vs East Timor: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Dominican Republic
48.13
in 2019
East Timor
47.84
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
150th
East Timor rank
151st
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- East Timor
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 48.13 against 47.84 in East Timor, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Timor ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 150th and East Timor ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.23 | 47.84 | 4.61 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 48.85 | 47.84 | 1.01 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Dominican Republic or East Timor?
- Dominican Republic, at 48.13 against 47.84 in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Dominican Republic and East Timor?
- 0.29, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and East Timor rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 150th and East Timor ranks 151st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.