Ecuador vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Ecuador
69.45
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
70.03
in 2019
Ecuador rank
85th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
82nd

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports 70.03 against 69.45 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.58.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 85th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 82nd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Rep. in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 69.45 15.73 53.72 Ecuador
2010s 69.45 76.08 6.63 Iran, Islamic Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Ecuador or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at 70.03 against 69.45 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Ecuador and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0.58, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Ecuador ranks 85th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.