Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Gambia, The: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Egypt, Arab Republic of
57.64
in 2019
Gambia, The
57.64
in 2019
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
128th
Gambia, The rank
128th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Egypt, Arab Republic of
- Gambia, The
How they compare
Egypt, Arab Republic of currently reports 57.64 against 57.64 in Gambia, The, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia, The ahead.
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 128th and Gambia, The ranks 128th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt, Arab Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Gambia, The in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt, Arab Republic of | Gambia, The | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.53 | 57.93 | 12.39 | Gambia, The |
| 2010s | 57.84 | 57.64 | 0.2017 | Egypt, Arab Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Egypt, Arab Republic of or Gambia, The?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of, at 57.64 against 57.64 in Gambia, The as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Gambia, The?
- 0, with Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Gambia, The?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Gambia, The rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 128th and Gambia, The ranks 128th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.