El Salvador vs Slovak Republic: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
El Salvador
18.16
in 2019
Slovak Republic
21.04
in 2019
El Salvador rank
178th
Slovak Republic rank
177th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 21.04 against 18.16 in El Salvador, a difference of 2.88.
That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 178th and Slovak Republic ranks 177th of 190 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.71 | 21.04 | 35.68 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 54.27 | 21.04 | 33.23 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, El Salvador or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 21.04 against 18.16 in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between El Salvador and Slovak Republic?
- 2.88, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Slovak Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Slovak Republic rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 178th and Slovak Republic ranks 177th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.