Equatorial Guinea vs Guinea-Bissau: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
65.99
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
66.28
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
99th
Guinea-Bissau rank
98th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 66.28 against 65.99 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.29.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 99th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th of 188 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 65.99 70.61 4.61 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 65.99 67.58 1.59 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 66.28 against 65.99 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
0.29, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 99th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.