Guatemala vs Nicaragua: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Guatemala
42.36
in 2019
Nicaragua
42.65
in 2019
Guatemala rank
160th
Nicaragua rank
159th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nicaragua
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 42.65 against 42.36 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.29.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Guatemala ranks 160th and Nicaragua ranks 159th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 30.66 41.5 10.84 Nicaragua
2010s 54.78 42.65 12.13 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Guatemala or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 42.65 against 42.36 in Guatemala as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Guatemala and Nicaragua?
0.29, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nicaragua?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Nicaragua rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Guatemala ranks 160th and Nicaragua ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.