Honduras vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Honduras
69.45
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
70.03
in 2019
Honduras rank
85th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
82nd

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Honduras
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports 70.03 against 69.45 in Honduras, a difference of 0.58.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 85th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 82nd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Rep. in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 64.03 15.73 48.3 Honduras
2010s 71.87 76.08 4.21 Iran, Islamic Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Honduras or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at 70.03 against 69.45 in Honduras as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Honduras and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0.58, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Honduras and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Honduras ranks 85th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 82nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.