Indonesia vs Timor-Leste: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Indonesia
49.82
in 2019
Timor-Leste
47.84
in 2019
Indonesia rank
149th
Timor-Leste rank
151st

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Indonesia
  • Timor-Leste
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 49.82 against 47.84 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 1.98.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 149th and Timor-Leste ranks 151st of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 52.45 47.84 4.61 Indonesia
2010s 50.59 47.84 2.75 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Indonesia or Timor-Leste?
Indonesia, at 49.82 against 47.84 in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Indonesia and Timor-Leste?
1.98, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Timor-Leste?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Timor-Leste rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Indonesia ranks 149th and Timor-Leste ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.