Kiribati vs Tanzania: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Kiribati
54.18
in 2019
Tanzania
54.47
in 2019
Kiribati rank
139th
Tanzania rank
137th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tanzania
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 54.47 against 54.18 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.29.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 139th and Tanzania ranks 137th of 188 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 54.29 45.24 9.05 Kiribati
2010s 54.18 45.79 8.39 Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Kiribati or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 54.47 against 54.18 in Kiribati as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Kiribati and Tanzania?
0.29, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tanzania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Kiribati and Tanzania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Kiribati ranks 139th and Tanzania ranks 137th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.