South Korea vs Singapore: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

South Korea
99.57
in 2019
Singapore
97.26
in 2019
South Korea rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • Singapore
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 99.57 against 97.26 in Singapore, a difference of 2.31.

Across all 15 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 98.79 92.45 6.34 South Korea
2010s 99.52 96.15 3.37 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, South Korea or Singapore?
South Korea, at 99.57 against 97.26 in Singapore as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between South Korea and Singapore?
2.31, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Singapore?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Singapore rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
South Korea ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.