Liberia vs Micronesia (country): Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Liberia
82.42
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
83
in 2019
Liberia rank
27th
Micronesia (country) rank
24th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Liberia
  • Micronesia (country)
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 83 against 82.42 in Liberia, a difference of 0.58.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.

Liberia ranks 27th and Micronesia (country) ranks 24th of 188 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 72.62 83 10.37 Micronesia (country)
2010s 82.42 83 0.5763 Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Liberia or Micronesia (country)?
Micronesia (country), at 83 against 82.42 in Liberia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Liberia and Micronesia (country)?
0.58, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Micronesia (country)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Liberia and Micronesia (country) rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Liberia ranks 27th and Micronesia (country) ranks 24th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.