Lithuania vs Ukraine: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Lithuania
86.17
in 2019
Ukraine
86.6
in 2019
Lithuania rank
17th
Ukraine rank
16th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Ukraine
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 86.6 against 86.17 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.43.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 17th and Ukraine ranks 16th of 188 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 61.07 0 61.07 Lithuania
2010s 76.31 58.49 17.82 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Lithuania or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 86.6 against 86.17 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Lithuania and Ukraine?
0.43, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Ukraine?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Ukraine rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Lithuania ranks 17th and Ukraine ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.