Lithuania vs United States: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Lithuania
86.17
in 2019
United States
84.27
in 2019
Lithuania rank
17th
United States rank
19th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • United States
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 86.17 against 84.27 in United States, a difference of 1.9.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States ahead.

Lithuania ranks 17th and United States ranks 19th of 188 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania United States Difference Ahead
2000s 61.07 90.49 29.42 United States
2010s 76.31 83.54 7.23 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Lithuania or United States?
Lithuania, at 86.17 against 84.27 in United States as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Lithuania and United States?
1.9, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and United States?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and United States rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Lithuania ranks 17th and United States ranks 19th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.